take a look at the mail and the calendar of upcoming events.
I was asked a question about rare earths by Punctures You to Help You, Richard, who asked are they really rare and why? Well, I mumbled something about the nuclear physics reactions during a supernova that just seem to produce less and less of each element in a declining function of atomic number, but I couldn't remember the details. It is also an interesting question why the so called rare earths appear in such low quantities on Earth. Ok, Ok, lets start with the nuclear physics. Check out the nuclear physics account for the amounts of elements produced in accordance with the
Oddo-Harkins rule. The plot has vertical axis the log of abundances with decreasing trend with respect to atomic number and even atomic number elements have slightly higher abundances, due to stability considerations, than the odd atomic number neighbors. For more about this rule check out: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oddo–Harkins_rule
|Oddo_Harkins rule shows higher abundance for even atomic number and declining amount with atomic number|
Hope that sort of explains your question, Richard.
I also had a series of emails from Still into Control, Expert, Gene, who graciously offered to help me read some FITS files. I've been collecting a number of FITS files from the astrometry.net website, which provides several of these data files for each of the images that I upload for identification of the sky position. The FITS file format is used by astronomers to exchange images and data between observatories and my usual astronomical software tools did not have the capability to read data formatted FITS files. I do have some other software tools, like Matlab and Mathematica, which do have the capability to read FITS files, but I couldn't quite get the syntax figured out. So, Gene was able to find one of the secrets and I can now examine some of the data files. Gene, is a consultant and usually sends an invoice for his work and he actually sent one to me too. Oh, oh, I don't know if I can afford this bill. Luckily, the invoice was for $0.00. Thanks Gene
This month's calendar of upcoming events is pretty busy too. I will be in San Diego for most of this week at the Energy Storage North America conference. This is one of the last of my dreams that I had hoped would be one of the capstones on my engineering career, so we will see what happens there. I hope to plan for at least one more chance to get another image of Ceres, so to be able to try the "blinking" approach to detecting faint objects.
Additionally, there is a free open house at the Carnegie Observatory office in Pasadena on Sunday, Oct 16. The event is free and should be interesting to amateurs and non-amateurs as well. Check out the details at: http://obs.carnegiescience.edu/content/15th-annual-open-house
Thanks for the Carnegie update, Math Whiz, Dave.
Also if your interest in astronomy runs a little deeper the American Astronomical Society will conduct their DPS meeting in Pasadena that week too. This conference is not free, but I will met up there with Math Whiz, Dave. Check out the details at: https://aas.org/meetings/dps48
AAS charges a lot for attending their conferences, maybe to keep the amateur crowd, like ourselves out, even though they keep saying they are trying to accommodate the amateurs, who by the way provide a lot of support for real astronomers because our telescopes can be readily made available, without requesting a night of observing months in advance. Of course, the types of objects that amateurs can see is often quite limited compared to large scopes, but its sort of hard to beat a worldwide group of interested folks that can point a camera anywhere, anytime. Anyone else up for attending this event?
Now lets get back to some of the current events. Some of our science squad showed up at Chapman University for the Roger Penrose capstone lecture and other presentations by Paul Davies, Yakir Aharonov, discovered Aharonov-Bohm effect among others, Andrew Brigg, condensed matter physicist s and Werner Herzog, writer and producer of "Cave of Forgotten Dreams", and many others. It was a fun day being on campus. We had quite a good turnout from our OCA Astrophysics SIG and of course our own little posse of science squad members.
|Paul Davies interviews Sir Roger Penrose, who talked about his new book (title shown) at Chapman University|
Finally, let's talk about why the asteroid Pallas did not show up (immediately, that is) in the image presented last time. Well, it turned out that my calculation of the predicted sky location was off because I had not updated my Megastar software with the latest minor planets ephemeris. So there you have it, operator error. Now the process of discovering that is a little longer story, which begins when I first went to my goto astronomy expert, Author and OCA Secretary, Bob, who, with his experienced eye detected the missing asteroid. He didn't offer an explanation as to why my calculations were off, but suggested that I could take another image of the same sky location, maybe a day or two later and then overlay the two star images and "blink" the images, first one and then the other, and any slowly moving object, like the missing asteroid, should be able to be detected. Wow, that is a great idea and I agreed that I would try that. Blinking the images is one of the methods used by professional astronomers to find the object that is slightly moving against the fixed star pattern in the sky. Thank you for that suggestion Bob.
Now, knowing that Pallas could actually be seen in the image, I rechecked all my position calculations and discovered that my minor planet ephemeris was out of date and when I corrected for that, Hooray!, that darn Pallas was just exactly where it should be. See below.
|Asteroid Pallas shows up exactly where it should be. But what is that purple object?|
The sky coordinates of the purple object are: RA = 21 07 17 and Dec = +2 25 12
Now, I still want to try the blinking method, but the sky is just too bright here at Palmia Observatory to get an image of Pallas here. I will have to schedule that for my next time out at the Candy Store observatory. Also, given that Pallas is too dim here, there is no chance that I would be able to see the purple object either, so I sent out a note to other friendly amateurs, including Bob at Altimiri Observatory and Eric at Candy Store Observatory, to see if they could add that object to their observing list. We will see what happens. For sure, I will add it to my observing list when I'm next at the Candy Store.
I should say something about the different focal length values that you are maybe beginning to notice. Like, why did I use 240mm or 250mm or even 600m focal length for some images or other. It really doesn't and didn't have anything to do with a need or plan to have a particular focal length other than I set out with the intention to use 600mm focal length setting on all of these images taken with my 150-600mm telephoto lens. I always tried to set the lens to 600mm since this would give images with the widest available aperture and therefore get more light per length of exposure and the size of the target object always fit with that size of focal length. So, yes, I always set off with the intention of setting the lens to 600mm, but I noticed that the lens setting had a tendency to change when the scope was in motion. The focal length of the lens is set by rotating the barrel which causes the length to increase or decrease depending on the direction the barrel is rotated. But when the lens is upright or almost vertical, the weight of the lens causes it to self rotate and the focal length setting slowly and erratically and intermittently begins to decrease and just apparently seemed to stop at about 240-250mm. So, to fix this problem, I now just use a piece of masking tape to keep the lens setting fixed. See below.
|Using a piece of masking tape to "lock" the lens focal length setting|
Chalk this up to a lesson learned
The actual focal length setting is determined during the astrometry phase of analysis, where the background star pattern is compared to actual star catalog positions and that particular angular separation is then attributed to one very specific focal length. So, I might have thought that I set the lens to 600mm, but the astrometric analysis says that the focal length in reality was 580mm, or some such thing. In the meantime, I set up the 600mm lens last night and tried to get a somewhat brighter asteroid, Ceres. This time, I used the correct ephemeris data and predicted right where the asteroid should be. See the 30 second, 580mm exposure below.
|Astrometry Screenshot showing reference stars at T1 = Ceres position|
When this image of Ceres is magnified and shown at 800% normal size, one can immediately see that the object is observed very close to its predicted location on the sky. In the following screenshot, the four red circles are my way of identifying where the target should be found, which is right in the middle with each circle separated from its neighbor by one arc minute. So, we see right away that the prediction matches the observation within one arc minute. See below.
|Asteroid Ceres shown next to its predicted location between red circles. |
Object Ceres location is shown in the Astrometry tool window at the right
I should say one more thing about finding that the planets and minor planets wander about and the ephemeris showing where they are located needs to be updated more frequently than do ephemerae of stars. In researching what the problem was I ran across descriptions of several different types of right ascension and declination. I was reading a 35 page document describing all the differences and it started to make my head spin. One thing that stood out is whether the published RA and Dec include the effects of light travel time. Wow, now they are really trying to get accurate. But this is not as far out as one might assume because this differing light travel time was first proposed by Roemer as a way to measure the speed of light by comparing transits of Jupiter's moon Io, when the Earth is in different locations of its orbit. If you want to read up more on this then check out Author and OCA Secretary, Bob's book, "Astronomical Discoveries You Can Make Too!, Replicating the Work of the Great Observers". He has set out, in projects 26 and 27, how you, too, can repeat Roemer's measurement of the speed of light. In fact, there is a person in OCA, Just a Teenager, Sydney, who we first met during Black Star party, something like on February 22 post, and she was just completing one half of the transit observations necessary to measure the speed of light. Remember that if light takes about 8 minutes to travel from the sun to the Earth, when the Earth is on opposite sides of the sun, the light travel time can differ by twice that or 16 minutes and when this difference in timing is applied to the transit timing diagrams for Io, one can see sort of a phase shift that is proportional to the speed of light. Pretty neat. I have not heard yet how the experiment is faring, but I hope for success because it is so neat.
Until next time,